<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind Turbines Inspired By Ancient Methods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gearfuse.com/wind-turbines-inspired-by-ancient-methods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/wind-turbines-inspired-by-ancient-methods/</link>
	<description>Gearfuse is a tech blog featuring news, views and opinions on the best of gadgets, gizmos, consumer electronics, hardware and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:27:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don Ficker</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/wind-turbines-inspired-by-ancient-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-151584</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Ficker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=9261#comment-151584</guid>
		<description>Hydrogen inflated units seem like a good idea too, of course, the Hindenburg incident may dampen enthusiasm for this approach.
    Small, co-op or homeowner sized units could contribute to  decentralized power supply which is a good idea for a lot of reasons, unless you want to be the one supplying power to everyone.
   Would &quot;no fly&quot; zones have to be established where these turbines are installed,or launched?
   I love this approach because it seems like a low cost way to get the turbine up where the wind is best, and you wouldn&#039;t have to cut trees down, as I would have to,to generate power for my home.
 I vote for small units widely distributed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hydrogen inflated units seem like a good idea too, of course, the Hindenburg incident may dampen enthusiasm for this approach.<br />
    Small, co-op or homeowner sized units could contribute to  decentralized power supply which is a good idea for a lot of reasons, unless you want to be the one supplying power to everyone.<br />
   Would &#8220;no fly&#8221; zones have to be established where these turbines are installed,or launched?<br />
   I love this approach because it seems like a low cost way to get the turbine up where the wind is best, and you wouldn&#8217;t have to cut trees down, as I would have to,to generate power for my home.<br />
 I vote for small units widely distributed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
