<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twelve Sided Rubik&#8217;s Cube Puzzle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/</link>
	<description>Technology, Science, Culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-605097</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=16767#comment-605097</guid>
		<description>my boyfriend can do all different types of cubes. i got him this one and has almost figured it out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my boyfriend can do all different types of cubes. i got him this one and has almost figured it out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kavinash</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-290439</link>
		<dc:creator>kavinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=16767#comment-290439</guid>
		<description>i solved it both 3x3x3   &amp;  4x4x4!!!!!
:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i solved it both 3x3x3   &amp;  4x4x4!!!!!<br />
 <img src='http://www.gearfuse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smarterthanyoudimwad</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-286183</link>
		<dc:creator>smarterthanyoudimwad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=16767#comment-286183</guid>
		<description>@Parker-

Just because men have more left-braindedness (lol thats not a word) women are good problem solvers. And I still have never met a guy who can solve a rubix cube. (with the exeption of Jeff verasano (dont know how to spell his last name), I met him since then). 


BTW I KNOW THATS NOT A PETAMINX IM NOT RETARDED

and yes, megaminxes are very easy. I got one the day I was sick, solved it in under 30 minutes. And I do agree, even layer cubes are different than odd layer cubes. I can solve all of the 2x2 - 7x7 and yes. I hate even layers. And BTW on gigaminx solves, yes megaminx:rubixcube = gigaminx: high orders. 

it just takes a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Parker-</p>
<p>Just because men have more left-braindedness (lol thats not a word) women are good problem solvers. And I still have never met a guy who can solve a rubix cube. (with the exeption of Jeff verasano (dont know how to spell his last name), I met him since then). </p>
<p>BTW I KNOW THATS NOT A PETAMINX IM NOT RETARDED</p>
<p>and yes, megaminxes are very easy. I got one the day I was sick, solved it in under 30 minutes. And I do agree, even layer cubes are different than odd layer cubes. I can solve all of the 2&#215;2 &#8211; 7&#215;7 and yes. I hate even layers. And BTW on gigaminx solves, yes megaminx:rubixcube = gigaminx: high orders. </p>
<p>it just takes a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-260533</link>
		<dc:creator>Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=16767#comment-260533</guid>
		<description>There is only one girl among the 10+ people whom I know can solve a basic Rubik&#039;s cube. I can solve a cube with any number of layers, even or odd (there is a huge fundamental difference between the two). I got the basic dodecahedron for Christmas this year and solved it in a week without consulting anyone or anything. I have little doubt I could solve a Gigaminx or Petaminx using the same algorithms.

I&#039;m not bragging, I just think &quot;smarterthanyoudimwad&quot; should know that men are statistically better problem-solvers, better object-oriented thinkers, and more left-brained in general (emphasis on &quot;in general&quot;). You don&#039;t know any guys who can do it? Have you checked with every single one of them? Are you sure your group of male friends is a good demographic representation of today&#039;s male society? One of those answers will be no I think.

Also, this is a perfect example of why &quot;reading&quot; is superior to &quot;skimming&quot;. Had you &quot;read&quot; the article, you would know that the author&#039;s use of the word &quot;Petaminx&quot; was in reference to another puzzle, to which he gave a link. Read. Don&#039;t skim.

To the author: the Petaminx is essentially the same exact puzzle as this Gigaminx, except it has more layers and (specifically the one you linked to) is more curvy and probably more fragile. It takes a good deal more time to solve, but employs all the same techniques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is only one girl among the 10+ people whom I know can solve a basic Rubik&#8217;s cube. I can solve a cube with any number of layers, even or odd (there is a huge fundamental difference between the two). I got the basic dodecahedron for Christmas this year and solved it in a week without consulting anyone or anything. I have little doubt I could solve a Gigaminx or Petaminx using the same algorithms.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not bragging, I just think &#8220;smarterthanyoudimwad&#8221; should know that men are statistically better problem-solvers, better object-oriented thinkers, and more left-brained in general (emphasis on &#8220;in general&#8221;). You don&#8217;t know any guys who can do it? Have you checked with every single one of them? Are you sure your group of male friends is a good demographic representation of today&#8217;s male society? One of those answers will be no I think.</p>
<p>Also, this is a perfect example of why &#8220;reading&#8221; is superior to &#8220;skimming&#8221;. Had you &#8220;read&#8221; the article, you would know that the author&#8217;s use of the word &#8220;Petaminx&#8221; was in reference to another puzzle, to which he gave a link. Read. Don&#8217;t skim.</p>
<p>To the author: the Petaminx is essentially the same exact puzzle as this Gigaminx, except it has more layers and (specifically the one you linked to) is more curvy and probably more fragile. It takes a good deal more time to solve, but employs all the same techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmaterThanSmarterThanYou</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-250235</link>
		<dc:creator>SmaterThanSmarterThanYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=16767#comment-250235</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never even heard of a &quot;rubix&quot; cube, so I guess I&#039;ve never met someone who could solve it. I believe you meant Rubik&#039;s Cube, named after someone. The apostrophe helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never even heard of a &#8220;rubix&#8221; cube, so I guess I&#8217;ve never met someone who could solve it. I believe you meant Rubik&#8217;s Cube, named after someone. The apostrophe helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smarterthanyoudimwad</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-236204</link>
		<dc:creator>smarterthanyoudimwad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=16767#comment-236204</guid>
		<description>okay. 

i can solve one of those. 

no joke, 

first off, its not called a petaminx..

its a gigaminx. and it&#039;s not a 12 sided rubix cube, its a dododecahedron. 

and, those are perfectly easy. 

go to youtube, and type in gigaminx solve, and yes, if a guy (im a girl) could do that, i would be highly impressed because i havn&#039;t even met a guy who could do a rubix cube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay. </p>
<p>i can solve one of those. </p>
<p>no joke, </p>
<p>first off, its not called a petaminx..</p>
<p>its a gigaminx. and it&#8217;s not a 12 sided rubix cube, its a dododecahedron. </p>
<p>and, those are perfectly easy. </p>
<p>go to youtube, and type in gigaminx solve, and yes, if a guy (im a girl) could do that, i would be highly impressed because i havn&#8217;t even met a guy who could do a rubix cube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Dobrow</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-221495</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dobrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=16767#comment-221495</guid>
		<description>It would suck even more if you were completely blind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would suck even more if you were completely blind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.Block</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-221490</link>
		<dc:creator>E.Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=16767#comment-221490</guid>
		<description>Man, that must suck if you&#039;re colorblind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, that must suck if you&#8217;re colorblind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FReNeTiC</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/twelve-sided-rubiks-cube-puzzle/comment-page-1/#comment-216013</link>
		<dc:creator>FReNeTiC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=16767#comment-216013</guid>
		<description>That seems a little bit disturbing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seems a little bit disturbing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/14 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk
Object Caching 388/391 objects using disk

Served from: www.gearfuse.com @ 2012-02-16 14:24:33 -->
