<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wrong Case: Energy Consumption and Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gearfuse.com/the-wrong-case-energy-consumption-and-television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-wrong-case-energy-consumption-and-television/</link>
	<description>Gearfuse is a tech blog featuring news, views and opinions on the best of gadgets, gizmos, consumer electronics, hardware and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:31:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tahrey</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-wrong-case-energy-consumption-and-television/comment-page-1/#comment-161520</link>
		<dc:creator>tahrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=10423#comment-161520</guid>
		<description>the problem is that a CRT is less efficient per inch than an LCD... but people are buying much, much bigger LCDs than they would have had CRTs a decade ago. So the balance is about the same if not higher.

EG my family has switched from a 21&quot; and a 14&quot; to a 42 and a 32. I would easily believe that our consumption has gone UP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem is that a CRT is less efficient per inch than an LCD&#8230; but people are buying much, much bigger LCDs than they would have had CRTs a decade ago. So the balance is about the same if not higher.</p>
<p>EG my family has switched from a 21&#8243; and a 14&#8243; to a 42 and a 32. I would easily believe that our consumption has gone UP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobrainerdeals</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-wrong-case-energy-consumption-and-television/comment-page-1/#comment-156091</link>
		<dc:creator>nobrainerdeals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=10423#comment-156091</guid>
		<description>I really think it is PGE that is making this push. Ever since they over paid for electricity from the Enron people they have been pushing conservation. For the most part its cool but how could anyone argue that a LCD uses more power then a CRT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think it is PGE that is making this push. Ever since they over paid for electricity from the Enron people they have been pushing conservation. For the most part its cool but how could anyone argue that a LCD uses more power then a CRT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
