<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wrong Case: Energy Consumption and Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gearfuse.com/the-wrong-case-energy-consumption-and-television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-wrong-case-energy-consumption-and-television/</link>
	<description>Technology, Science, Culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tahrey</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-wrong-case-energy-consumption-and-television/comment-page-1/#comment-161520</link>
		<dc:creator>tahrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=10423#comment-161520</guid>
		<description>the problem is that a CRT is less efficient per inch than an LCD... but people are buying much, much bigger LCDs than they would have had CRTs a decade ago. So the balance is about the same if not higher.

EG my family has switched from a 21&quot; and a 14&quot; to a 42 and a 32. I would easily believe that our consumption has gone UP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem is that a CRT is less efficient per inch than an LCD&#8230; but people are buying much, much bigger LCDs than they would have had CRTs a decade ago. So the balance is about the same if not higher.</p>
<p>EG my family has switched from a 21&#8243; and a 14&#8243; to a 42 and a 32. I would easily believe that our consumption has gone UP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobrainerdeals</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-wrong-case-energy-consumption-and-television/comment-page-1/#comment-156091</link>
		<dc:creator>nobrainerdeals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/?p=10423#comment-156091</guid>
		<description>I really think it is PGE that is making this push. Ever since they over paid for electricity from the Enron people they have been pushing conservation. For the most part its cool but how could anyone argue that a LCD uses more power then a CRT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think it is PGE that is making this push. Ever since they over paid for electricity from the Enron people they have been pushing conservation. For the most part its cool but how could anyone argue that a LCD uses more power then a CRT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk
Object Caching 246/249 objects using disk

Served from: www.gearfuse.com @ 2012-02-16 15:54:58 -->
