<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 5-mile WiFi Bridge That Costs Pennies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/</link>
	<description>Gearfuse is a tech blog featuring news, views and opinions on the best of gadgets, gizmos, consumer electronics, hardware and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:27:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Couture</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/comment-page-1/#comment-96369</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Couture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/#comment-96369</guid>
		<description>Yea, but this are BRIDGES, not Routers. They can only connect to eachother, and not any computer or router. They offer no IP address resolution or routing of signals. It&#039;s like taking one cat-5 cable and making it invisible for 5 miles. The bridge even requires that they have direct line of sight. If Philly got these, all it would do was provide a bunch of extra lengths of wire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, but this are BRIDGES, not Routers. They can only connect to eachother, and not any computer or router. They offer no IP address resolution or routing of signals. It&#8217;s like taking one cat-5 cable and making it invisible for 5 miles. The bridge even requires that they have direct line of sight. If Philly got these, all it would do was provide a bunch of extra lengths of wire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Veneziani</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/comment-page-1/#comment-96285</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince Veneziani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/#comment-96285</guid>
		<description>The point that I&#039;m trying to get across is that Philadelphia has no wireless solution now. Getting a few of these and running them up and down Broad St. could easily provide a good chunk of Center City and at least three schools (UArts, Temple and a high school for the arts) with a solid wireless connection.

Don&#039;t hate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point that I&#8217;m trying to get across is that Philadelphia has no wireless solution now. Getting a few of these and running them up and down Broad St. could easily provide a good chunk of Center City and at least three schools (UArts, Temple and a high school for the arts) with a solid wireless connection.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t hate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sdfg</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/comment-page-1/#comment-96278</link>
		<dc:creator>Sdfg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/#comment-96278</guid>
		<description>Your post only makes sense if you&#039;re assuming it&#039;s an omni.   
As these are uni -- they connect one point to another and come as a pair-- they are completely useless for mesh-style networks intended to provide blanket coverage. According to the source, this set actually requires LoS between the two tranceivers. Did you read it? No, you did not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post only makes sense if you&#8217;re assuming it&#8217;s an omni.<br />
As these are uni &#8212; they connect one point to another and come as a pair&#8211; they are completely useless for mesh-style networks intended to provide blanket coverage. According to the source, this set actually requires LoS between the two tranceivers. Did you read it? No, you did not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Veneziani</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/comment-page-1/#comment-96238</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince Veneziani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/#comment-96238</guid>
		<description>Care to point out where I claim it&#039;s &quot;omnidirectional&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Care to point out where I claim it&#8217;s &#8220;omnidirectional&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yo Quiero Taco Phone</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/comment-page-1/#comment-96235</link>
		<dc:creator>Yo Quiero Taco Phone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/the-5-mile-wifi-bridge-that-costs-pennies/#comment-96235</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not omnidirectional, dumbass, it&#039;s point to point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not omnidirectional, dumbass, it&#8217;s point to point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
