<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LG working on a speedy next-gen Prada phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gearfuse.com/lg-working-on-a-speedy-next-gen-prada-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/lg-working-on-a-speedy-next-gen-prada-phone/</link>
	<description>Gearfuse is a tech blog featuring news, views and opinions on the best of gadgets, gizmos, consumer electronics, hardware and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/lg-working-on-a-speedy-next-gen-prada-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-79032</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/lg-working-on-a-speedy-next-gen-prada-phone/#comment-79032</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Prada phone was originally designed to take on the iPhone, and besides being a designer phone, lacked the features to do so.&quot;

Wasn&#039;t the KE850 aka &quot;PRADA phone&quot; released about a month after the iPhone was announced? With this being the case, how can you make the above statement that it was &quot;originally designed to take on the iPhone&quot;? 

I&#039;m curious as to how you concluded that the KE850 owes its existence to the iPhone being shown in form, not function, only...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Prada phone was originally designed to take on the iPhone, and besides being a designer phone, lacked the features to do so.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t the KE850 aka &#8220;PRADA phone&#8221; released about a month after the iPhone was announced? With this being the case, how can you make the above statement that it was &#8220;originally designed to take on the iPhone&#8221;? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious as to how you concluded that the KE850 owes its existence to the iPhone being shown in form, not function, only&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ju</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/lg-working-on-a-speedy-next-gen-prada-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-50675</link>
		<dc:creator>ju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/lg-working-on-a-speedy-next-gen-prada-phone/#comment-50675</guid>
		<description>when will it be out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when will it be out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/lg-working-on-a-speedy-next-gen-prada-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-42215</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/lg-working-on-a-speedy-next-gen-prada-phone/#comment-42215</guid>
		<description>but what about the keyboard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but what about the keyboard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
