<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flux Capacitor Replica Is Back To The Future&#8230;Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/</link>
	<description>Technology, Science, Culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougsdream</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/comment-page-1/#comment-430804</link>
		<dc:creator>dougsdream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/#comment-430804</guid>
		<description>Thanks SilentBoy.  I can finally rest easy now that this debate has been put to rest.
&quot;jig-a-watt&quot; oh yeah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks SilentBoy.  I can finally rest easy now that this debate has been put to rest.<br />
&#8220;jig-a-watt&#8221; oh yeah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilentBoy741</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/comment-page-1/#comment-410591</link>
		<dc:creator>SilentBoy741</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 06:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/#comment-410591</guid>
		<description>It is correctly pronounced &quot;jig-a-watt&quot;.  The prefix giga is from the Latin gigas (for &quot;giant&quot;).  Words using this prefix are pronounced with the &quot;j&quot; sound.  We say &quot;Ji-gantic&quot; and &quot;Ji-ant&quot;, not &quot;Gig-antic&quot; and &quot;Guy-ant&quot;.  Doc Brown is the only one who pronounced it properly.  The &quot;whole internet culture&quot; is incorrect.  It has fallen into accepted use simply because so many of us mispronounce it thus.  Even I gave up the crusade in about 1993...   :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is correctly pronounced &#8220;jig-a-watt&#8221;.  The prefix giga is from the Latin gigas (for &#8220;giant&#8221;).  Words using this prefix are pronounced with the &#8220;j&#8221; sound.  We say &#8220;Ji-gantic&#8221; and &#8220;Ji-ant&#8221;, not &#8220;Gig-antic&#8221; and &#8220;Guy-ant&#8221;.  Doc Brown is the only one who pronounced it properly.  The &#8220;whole internet culture&#8221; is incorrect.  It has fallen into accepted use simply because so many of us mispronounce it thus.  Even I gave up the crusade in about 1993&#8230;   <img src='http://www.gearfuse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/comment-page-1/#comment-331084</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/#comment-331084</guid>
		<description>It is Gigawatts because back then we were not commonly using the prefix to talk about gigabytes.  Now we are - now its seems silly that they used the soft g pronunciation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is Gigawatts because back then we were not commonly using the prefix to talk about gigabytes.  Now we are &#8211; now its seems silly that they used the soft g pronunciation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatG</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/comment-page-1/#comment-63532</link>
		<dc:creator>PatG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 08:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/#comment-63532</guid>
		<description>No, it should be &quot;jigowatts&quot;, not &quot;jiggowatts&quot;.

Yes Eric, we know that in reality it should be &quot;gigawatts&quot;, but there&#039;s a whole internet culture built upon the fact that Doc Brown says &quot;jigo&quot;. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it should be &#8220;jigowatts&#8221;, not &#8220;jiggowatts&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yes Eric, we know that in reality it should be &#8220;gigawatts&#8221;, but there&#8217;s a whole internet culture built upon the fact that Doc Brown says &#8220;jigo&#8221;. <img src='http://www.gearfuse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/comment-page-1/#comment-63358</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearfuse.com/flux-capacitor-replica-is-back-to-the-futureagain/#comment-63358</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s gigawatt&#039;s, not jiggowatts.  :-)

No but really, it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s gigawatt&#8217;s, not jiggowatts.  <img src='http://www.gearfuse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>No but really, it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk
Object Caching 312/315 objects using disk

Served from: www.gearfuse.com @ 2012-02-16 15:58:43 -->
